By Mayor Mike Halfacre, Fair HavenThe State of New Jersey has a fiscal year 2009 budget.
Governor Corzine is proud of this budget:
“They did take tough municipal aid hits, I understand that, just as the state government has taken a tough hit," Corzine said at the Statehouse. "But I will repeat what I have said over time. We have put $570 million into education spending, and it's $160 million in cuts in municipal aid. Since property taxes are 55 percent on average driven by school costs, people have a hard time arguing the overall impact will be as tough as is being suggested.
“Tough” is a relative term.
If all the promised aid come through, our School District will have a net increase of less than $30,000.00. This will require Extraordinary Aid, which is not a sure thing.
Currently, our municipal aid is down by $138,018.00, although that amount is not yet confirmed. This would mean a net loss of over $100,000.00, or about a penny on our tax rate, between the school and the Borough. This does not account for rising pension costs, contractual increases, and insurance costs, all of which the State of New Jersey could assist in reigning in, but does not.
Maybe the impact of a penny loss on the tax rate, or roughly $55.00 on an average Fair Haven home, is not “tough”. But the impact is certainly tougher than on other towns in New Jersey.
Apparently, it won’t be tough at all on the towns that are also Abbott Districts, who are getting additional increases over the already bloated state aid they receive, with no accountability for their waste.
It won’t be tough on School Superintendents in Abbott Districts, who can retire with multi-million dollar buy-outs. From our tax money.
It won’t be tough on the bus drivers in Abbott Districts that get cell phones that cost in excess of $300.00 per month. Each.
It won’t be tough on the bus drivers in Abbott Districts that get paid overtime to charge those cell phones.
It won’t be tough on the dead people that get property tax rebate checks, or get paychecks from Abbott Districts that are run by the State.
It won’t be that tough on the large cities, whose percentage cuts in Municipal aid are less than a quarter the cut incurred by Fair Haven.
It won’t be tough on those Abbott Districts that got an additional $3.9 billion in borrowed money for new school construction, despite your repeatedly professed desire that all new borrowing should go before the voters. All borrowing except for this borrowing, he meant.
Last year, Republicans predicted that the property tax rebates were unsustainable. This has come true, and they are slashed in this budget. I predict that next year, money will magically appear to again expand the budget beyond what we can afford, to pave the way for Corzine’s attempt at reelection.
Let’s hope that the voters don’t fall for it.
7 comments:
I must have rushed through this one, Art. There are some typos I am not happy about. My editor should have caught them ;)
I'm going to give that editor a talking to. He frequently lets me down too.
Dear Abbott complainants,
I've told you before, reverse the 1996 Dept. of Ed. ruling that bused the white kids away from Asbury Park, and you can get rid of NJ's most expensive Abbott District overnight.
Yet the same people who rail against Abbotts won't take this simple step to do it.
Hmmm. Wonder why?
So until you are willing to face the "music" (see the DOE decision if you don't get the music reference) about what is REALLY behind Abbotts...
Complain all you want.
Just don't be late with my $60 million Abbott check.
Get a second job to pay for it if you have to - I'll be surfing.
Sincerely,
City of Asbury Park.
Hey Art, Do you think Tom D. is as tired of typing that as we are of reading it?
Barry,
I see. You'd like to ignore the root cause of why you have to pay me $60 million yearly in Abbott money.
It's much easier to complain about having to do it, than to do the work of figuring out how to stop.
That right there = NJ politics in a nutshell.
I invite you, ArtG, The Mayor of Fair Haven, the guys over at CWA and any any other fellow Republican to look into the ruling and how to get rid of an Abbott overnight by reversing it.
That assumes they really do want to get rid of the Abbott. Maybe they don't.
Or, keep ignoring me if you wish.
Just don't be late with my check.
Sincerely,
City of Asbury Park.
Maybe Asbury has a gripe over the DOE ruling, whic, on the law and facts, I agree was wrong. But what about the other 30 Abbotts? What's their excuse?
Oh, and if memory serves correctly, the Abbott v. Burke litigation started well before the ruling which is the "root cause" of the problem. In fact, at the time of the 1996 DOE ruling, we were already up to "Abbott IV", with "Abbott I" being decided while you were still a student at Asbury Park High School.
But, that's your story and you're sticking to it.
Barry,
I'm going to agree with you on the other 30 districts.
Asbury Park is different.
I don't care when the Abbott cases started or ended. To qualify, you have to look to the incomes of the student families.
The 1996 ruling took Belmar, Avon, Bradley Beach, Allenhurst, Interlaken and Deal out of mix in the Asbury Park school district.
Do those sound like "Abbott" towns to you? Deal? Are you kidding me?
Those towns are now being bused AWAY from the public school closes to them, to a school further away.
Just bring them back. Asbury will lose its Abbott designation overnight.
The fight to get rid of the other 30 is going to be a really tough haul, because you have to attack the Constitutional ruling.
With Asbury Park, you don't. It's a matter of qulification - a much smaller issue to takle.
Good Republicans can score a victory over the State's most expensive Abbott by having that ruling reversed.
So, which Republican is going to tell Belmar, Avon, Bradley, Interlaken, Allenhurst and Deal we are going to work hard to get their kids back in APHS?
UH OH!!! I think I know why Republicans won't takle the issue.
So it's hypocrisy to complain about it if you refuse to fix it.
Don't be late with my check.
Sincerely,
City of Asbury Park
Post a Comment