Princeton, January 25, 2010 – Pledging a weekly roll-out of position papers outlining fresh approaches to address the economic and political problems facing America, businessman Scott Sipprelle (R-Princeton) today unveiled the six core principles of his “Blueprint for Renewal.”
“I refuse to be a candidate who offers timid, poll-tested sound-bytes masquerading as a panacea to the serious problems we face as a nation and a world,” said Sipprelle. “That is why I am unveiling the six core principles that will form the cornerstone of my campaign’s “Blueprint for Renewal,” aimed at addressing these problems by offering bold and dynamic solutions that will make America work again.”
Scott Sipprelle’s “Blueprint for Renewal”
A Pro-Jobs Agenda Grounded in Smart Investment.
“With unemployment exceeding 10% and a so-called stimulus package that has only added to the unemployment rolls, it’s time for a new direction,” said Sipprelle. “If this last year has proven anything, it’s that soaring government spending is not the answer to our economic problems. We need to remove the chokehold of government that is preventing job-creation. We must put our trust back in the entrepreneurial spirit and work ethic of the American people and we need new ideas and new incentives to nourish and revitalize private sector employment.”
Control Government Spending and the National Debt
“Washington spending is out of control,” said Sipprelle. “Deficit spending by both parties over the last 10 years has led to an enormous increase in our national debt, much of it owned by our economic and political adversaries like the Chinese and the Russians. If we are to remain a great and independent nation, we must reform our dysfunctional federal budget process and begin to recognize the danger posed by our massive unfunded liabilities.”
Reform the Tax Code to Spur Investment and Saving.
“According to the non-partisan Tax Foundation in Washington, the average American had to work 103 days in 2009 just to cover the amount of taxes they were expected to pay last year – that’s absurd,” said Sipprelle, who noted that here in New Jersey, the figure ballooned all the way up to 119 days, second worst in the country. “Not only will my plan cut income taxes for every working American, but it will also advocate for top-to-bottom reform of the entire federal tax code to make it fairer and simpler while also creating incentives for new investment.” (Source: http://www.taxfoundation.org/taxfreedomday/)
Reform Congress to Increase Integrity and Fiscal Responsibility.
“The toxic environment within the Beltway and, especially, within the halls of Congress has been years in the making and both political parties are to blame,” said Sipprelle. “I would start with constitutional term limits for members of both the House and Senate and eliminate the scandal-plagued practice of earmarks. We need fundamental systemic reform in Congress that begins to restore the confidence of ordinary Americans in their elected leaders.”
Reform Wall Street to Serve the Needs of the Broader Economy.
“My opponents are sure to make predictable attacks against my successful career in the financial industry and spout boilerplate anecdotes less about prompting reform and more about scoring political points. Unlike them, I know intimately how Wall Street should work and also why it failed,” said Sipprelle. “Long before it became politically popular to do so, I publicly criticized the governance problems and excesses that contributed to the financial collapse. I have the experience required to repair and remake Wall Street, without destroying one of our nation’s leading industries. My plan will make Wall Street work for Main Street, not the other way around, by serving its intended purpose: to allocate capital for investments that benefit all Americans, not just a select few.”
Promote Healthcare Solutions that Enhance Access, Choice and Affordability.
“Hatched via shady backroom deals, this so-called healthcare reform package in Congress was nothing more than a desperate attempt to shove government-controlled healthcare down the throats of Americans anguished about ever-rising costs and accessibility,” said Sipprelle. “My plan, on the other hand, will focus on lowering costs through the use of enhanced health information systems to streamline medical records, disease management and patient care. My plan will also promote solutions to expand healthcare access by giving consumers more individual choice as opposed to mandating one-size-fits-all plans.”
The Legacy of Thomas Lifson
15 hours ago
23 comments:
The devil is in the details. These general proposals indicate he has no clue about the legislatiive process. Cry all you want, it still is a reality (see 1994 class of House and Senate Republicans).
The vast majority of the unfunded liability for the Federal Government is Medicare followed by Social Security. Good luck
The constitutional amendment for term limits borders on idiotic since it will take two thirds of voth Houses and 3/4 of the States to enact. Again, good luck.
"our national debt, much of it owned by our economic and political adversaries like the Chinese and the Russians"
Russia owns $128bil of our debt (as of November), right behind Brazil and Hong Kong.
Typical. What do you want more of the same. Unless we try these things nothing will ever change. Enough of electing poiticial flunkies, time to only elect people who are going to introduce drastic change. If they don't deliver throw them out and try someone new. Career politicians are what destroyed NJ and is destroying this Country
Sipprelle's talking policy while Halfacre's throwing mud like a child in the sandbox. We need someone like this who actually understands this stuff to beat Holt in November.
Hey anon above, Halfacre had stuff up on his website months ago. He hit Holt all last year with Issue oriented press releases. Scott is so late to this party, it's silly.
That's right. Halfacre has been saying these same things for years, and they're on his website.
Sipprelle is just jumping on the bandwagon. And you can't read this anywhere, if Art wouldn't have posted it.
Halfacre asked him about his campaign contributions. Which means he's desperate and he's done. Sipprelle congratulated Scott Brown on his win. Oh man, what a visionary, let's already give hi the nomination!!
Yeah, Mike's website is packed full of brilliant policy ideas, like this gem...
"We must continue to ensure that tomorrow's leaders will be able to compete globally and lead our country in the 21st Century."
Mike, it is over.
And Sipprelle has this gem:
"Washington spending is out of control,”
Give me a break. So much for bold.
At least we can begin to compare the 2 candidates on issues. Sipprelle has posted 6 issues, and Halfacre has posted 11. I assume that they are in order of priority for each candidate.
At 1st look, there are some surprising differences:
Sipprelle has nothing on defense while Halfacre has 3 of 11 on Defense (Defense, Veterans, and Right to bear arms).
Halfacre has nothing on Jobs or the Economy. For Sipprelle this is priority 1.
Halfacre has nothing on Wall St. Reform which has become a contentious issue in Washington these days (Bernacke et al.) But this only became a hot issue last week with Obama'a quest for popularism.
Halfacre isn't qualified to be in the Congress. I am going to enjoy watching him concede defeat.
More comparison:
Both candidates have identified Spending, Taxes and Healthcare as priority issues.
Halfacre has a separate issue for Medicaid, which arguably, is part of Healthcare.
MH has listed 11 issuues and SS has listed 6. So there are 4 other issues identifed by MH which are not addressed by SS (Education-Technology-Innovation, Energy, Immigration and Social Security). The 1st 2 of these are in MH's top 6.
blah blah blah!..
Alternate Comparison:
Top 6 issues for MH:
1) Spending
2) Taxes
3) Defense
4) Education
5) Energy
6) Healthcare
Top 6 issues for SS:
1) Jobs
2) Spending
3) Taxes
4) Incumbency
5) Wall St.
6) Healthcare
(Priorities may change as events unfold in Washington.)
Interesting that some policy positions are being fleshed out.
Lets see more of this.
Anyone who doubts this is going to be a competetive primary has there head in the sand. Too early yet to say who will win. I think If Sipperelle gets the line in all the other counties he can win. On the other hand if Halfacre can make it a close race in the other counties he can still win.
Please explain: What does it mean to "get the line" in a county?
BTW:
Top 6 issues on Rush Holt website:
1) Jobs
2) Environment
3) Transportation
4) Homeland Security
5) Tax Policy
6) Social Security
Please maybe someone should post 50 priorities. I would say even 6 is too much to take on in a first term. Spending taxes and jobs are the real priorities right now in whatever order and are all interconnected. Lets tackle those first them worry about the rest later. Hopefully healthcare reform is dead for now. Lets fix the big three then start on the rest later.
Tom said...
Please explain: What does it mean to "get the line" in a county?
Tom,
Thank you for the quality of your participation here.
"The line" refers to ballot positioning. Each county party organization has the right to award the party endorsed candidates for various offices together the same ballot column and under the same slogan.
In primaries, being "on the line" is usually a significant advantage as party loyalist/activists can be counted on the make the effort to vote.
Personally, I hope that Healthcare reform is not dead, since it has such an impact on future spending and deficits.
At a minimum I would like to see tort reform, elimination of the anti-trust exemption, and a close look at other ways to reduce burgeoning medical costs.
Tom, If you are worried about costs consider this.
Whenever the government is involved in something prices go up
Art - Thanks for the explanation of a "line in a county".
The anon post at 6:26 this morning seemed to imply that SS had already secured the line in one county. Is this the case?
"... if Sipprelle gets the line in all the other counties ..."
Tom said...
Art - Thanks for the explanation of a "line in a county".
The anon post at 6:26 this morning seemed to imply that SS had already secured the line in one county. Is this the case?
"... if Sipprelle gets the line in all the other counties ..."
You're welcome, Tom.
None of the county lines have been awarded yet. Anonymous 6:26 is probably assuming, as many are, that SS has a lock on Mercer, as that is where he is from.
To anonymous 3:08pm - I agree that when govmt gets involved, prices go up, but govmt is already involved, so we need policies that make the involvement more effective, and get it on track.
Further to anonymous 11:35am - I agree that the top 3 priorities are jobs, spending and taxes. But I think 3 priorities is too narrow.
I think that (as of today) my top 6 would be:
1) Jobs
2) Spending
3) Taxes
4) Healthcare
5) Defense
6) Education
Healthcare: because we need to lower future costs and their impact on the deficit. Defense: because of the growing threats to our security, and the off-track solutions like terrorist trials in NYC. Education: because it is so related to Jobs in a competitive, worldwide market.
Post a Comment