Princeton, January 28, 2010 – Declaring the big-spending, job-killing policies of President Obama and House Speaker Pelosi “an unambiguous failure,” businessman and 12th District congressional candidate Scott Sipprelle (R-Princeton) released the following statement today in response to the President’s State of the Union speech last night.
“Like most Americans, I believe we need to move beyond made-for-TV speeches that fail to offer real solutions to the serious problems facing our country,” said Sipprelle, who unveiled the six core principles of his “Blueprint for Renewal” this week – available at www.SupportScott2010.com.
“In the wake of his agenda's stunning defeat in Massachusetts, the President’s pivot back to a discussion on jobs and economic recovery was predictable,” said Sipprelle. “The larger issue, though, is that Nancy Pelosi’s Congress remains firmly committed to an agenda of big government, unchecked debt, and central control. The fact of the matter is that nothing will change until we change Congress.”
Leftists Deserve the J6 Treatment
19 hours ago
Posts
10 comments:
Analytical observations. Succinct message. Professional demeanor.
He's the one to beat Holt.
And he will.
This was a Reaganesque speech. Sipprelle should have delivered the official rebuttal. Holt is toast.
There's only one problem. Quoting Paul Mulshine:
"His name is Scott Sipprelle and he was telling people why he would make a good congressman from New Jersey. Unfortunately, he’s not from New Jersey. He’s from Princeton. "
1) Mulshine is the same hack who spent the entire campaign last year railing against chris christie.
2) Fair Haven sure as hell ain't any more Jersey than Princeton. At least Princeton represents a greater portion of the district.
3) Agree Holt is toast, but only if Sipprelle is the candidate--Halfacre would get creamed in the General Election.
This is the kind of mature effective statements we need from a candidate! There is a big difference between running for Federal office and the gutter nonsense that goes on in local and county races.
Are the Siprelle commenters on here being paid by the post, or what?
No one has to "pay" Sipprelle supporters.
But the comment surely speaks to the thought process and modus operandi of the Halfacre campaign ....
"No one has to "pay" Sipprelle supporters. But the comment surely speaks to the thought process and modus operandi of the Halfacre campaign ...."
Hahaha. Wasn't I recently accused, just a few days ago, that I'm paid by the Halfacre campaign to post here?? If the Sipprelle supporters are being paid by post, doesn't mean everybody does it.
And by the way, Alan or whatever your name is, did you figure out who's paying who?
When Scott Sipprelle makes a statement he is on message. If you look to his opponent for any noteworthy statements they are empty of substance and carry no intellectual weight. Impugning Mr. Sipprelle’s conservative credentials is typical politics, and desperate. Questioning political contributions made mostly to Republicans and a few conservative Blue Dog Democrats, who should always be welcomed into our conservative community, is just the type of political discourse that threaten a Republican victory in November. Self-interest is only a virtue when it is aligned with the common good, in this case a Republican victory in a Democratic district, otherwise, a bold ego will strike out in a reckless manner irregardless of the consequences.
"Self-interest is only a virtue when it is aligned with the common good, in this case a Republican victory in a Democratic district, otherwise, a bold ego will strike out in a reckless manner irregardless of the consequences."
What he said.....^^^^.....or she said ....
Think about it, folks.
Brilliantly stated, Aratus. Thanks.
memo to the Halfacre campaign: there's something wrong when your website's quotes and views are more dominated by your paid consultant, THAN BY THE CANDIDATE YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO BE PROMOTING..a cardinal rule many learned in the Chairman Bob Franks campaign schools of old was: don't let it become a pissing contest between the spokespeople!..you get into your own crazed little world, and lose sight of how your message is, or is not, resonating with the real voters!..
Post a Comment