Showing posts sorted by relevance for query "School Funding Formula". Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query "School Funding Formula". Sort by date Show all posts

Friday, January 04, 2008

Corzine makes deal with Booker on school funding scheme.

Tom Wilson had nothing to do with this photo/illustration


NJ GOP chair Tom Wilson released the following statement this afternoon:

Taxpayers and Public Deserve To Know How Much Deals Corzine Cut With Booker Will Cost Them


"We're just concerned with an impact that could be savage in our urban
districts," said Newark Mayor Cory Booker, who met privately with Corzine, Education Commissioner Lucille Davy and other top administration officials for about 90 minutes yesterday morning. After the meeting, Booker said he was encouraged Corzine was open to minimizing the effects the new plan would have on school operations and tax rates in districts like Newark. (“New formula for school aid moves ahead” Star Ledger, 1/4/2008)



Trenton, NJ -- New Jersey Republican State Committee Chairman Tom Wilson issued the following statement today:

“It may be a new year, but it’s politics as usual for Jon Corzine. Yesterday, he had a private pow-wow with Newark Mayor Cory Booker during which he apparently pledged to provide tens of millions of taxpayer dollars to sweeten the pot in a desperate attempt to gain the support of urban legislators for the school funding plan he’s trying to ram through the legislature.

When Corzine says he’ll ‘minimize the effects the new plan would have on tax rates in districts like Newark’ it can mean only one thing: New Jersey taxpayers will pay. What we don’t know is how much and with what money. The state is already in a $3 billion hole and taxpayers were clear in telling Corzine to stop spending money that neither the state nor the taxpayers have. The Governor pledged transparency and asked to be held accountable. He must provide everyone with the honest facts about what his Monty Hall routine is going to cost.

The Governor has abdicated fiscal responsibility in the name of political expediency. He’s more concerned with getting this done than with getting it done right. The worst part is that the taxpayers will once again be the ones holding the bag and paying for the Governor’s deal making. Legislators and the public have a right to know how much his horse trading is going to cost them and how the Governor plans to pay for it.

School funding figures don’t have to be provided to the districts until late February or early March. There is plenty of time between now and then to take a step back and work out a formula whose price tag is honest and transparent. The Governor’s actions make it clear that this formula is a gimmick and that tens, if not hundreds, of millions of dollars more will be provided by Corzine to urban districts at the expense of suburban taxpayers.

Former State Supreme Court Justice Gary Stein has warned this formula won’t be accepted by the Court. The Education Law Center has made it clear that they will be in court if this formula is enacted. Why would the legislature pass a formula that will guarantee that school funding is again placed in the hands of the Supreme Court for months if not years and deny suburban property taxpayers with any relief?”


The deal making to push through the school funding scheme is reminiscent of the 14% sales tax increase Corzine closed the government to get in the summer of 2005. Corzine righteously declared that the sales tax was need to get the state's fiscal house in order. Then he gave half the anticipated revenue away in Christmas tree items and the other half to property tax relief. Evidently the point was not to put the state's fiscal house in order, but to tax and spend more.

With then school funding scheme, Corzine is dealing away anything that could be considered reform to the special interest "stakeholders"; the NJEA and the Abbot Districts. There's no reform left, just more spending....and a strangle hold on the new legislature to pass the toll road monetization plan...which would give Corzine tens of billions more to squander.

Saturday, September 20, 2008

Walsh: It's YOUR fault that school taxes are so high

Newsflash: Democratic candidate for Middletown Township Committee is different than Trenton Democrats!

When Jon Corzine was inaguarated Governor, he boldy declared that New Jersey voters should hold him accountable. We will when we vote him out of office next year.

Seeing how that is working out for Corzine, Pat Walsh has declared that she is not accountable for her own record..you are and the state is.

In an interview with the Middletown Jester, Walsh blamed high school taxes on the voters, costly mistakes on state law and the cell tower on public apathy.

Here's the text of the embarassing interview:

Question: Are you responsible for taking 60% of property taxes to operate the schools in Middletown?

Answer: No. Speaking personally, I have to say that the statement is inaccurate for several reasons. First of all, the school budget is presented to voters for their approval every year unlike the township budget. For the last five years suburban school districts like Middletown were flat funded by the state forcing more of a burden on local taxpayers.
The funding formula for school districts in New Jersey was recently revised and voted on the legislature. There are many inequities built into the school funding formula and I have been advocating for changes to it that would benefit the taxpayers of Middletown for the last four years.
I believe the quality of our schools is one of the reasons we are in the Money Magazine’s top one hundred places to live and why many people choose to live in Middletown.

Question: Are you responsible for taking $1.5 billion of our tax dollars and raising taxes 100% during you tenure on the board?

Answer: No. Speaking for myself, I have to say that the school district cannot receive any taxes that are not approved by the voters. In addition, I am one member of a nine person Board of Education and have only one vote. Only with a majority vote of a board, is the budget adopted and then put on the ballot.
I have been re-elected to the Middletown Board of Education four times by the voters of Middletown, and just as the price of gas has increased dramatically in the last 12 years, so has the cost of providing an education to the children of Middletown.
What is interesting with the township budget, is their use of Deferred School Taxes to reduce the town budget, something they have done for approximately 20 years. Most towns shy away from the use of Deferred School Tax. Every year the Township Committee collects taxes at the higher rate for six months in advance and uses those funds as additional revenue, making it appear the Township’s tax rate is lower. At this point the amount of Deferred School Taxes in Middletown is 56 million.


Question: Did you pay two superintendents, six figure salaries for nearly two years?

Answer: The New Jersey State law sets strict requirements with regards to bringing tenure charges against any school employee that must be adhered to. As a board member I am required to abide by the law. The law requires a board of education to pay tenured employee’s salary after 180 days after the filling of tenure charges. The former superintendent was found guilty of those tenure charges.
But I ask you, if you found an employee misappropriating funds, what would you do; ignore it or hold that person accountable?

Question: Did you lobby for the contractor who has defaulted on the High School North Field?

Answer: No. School boards are required by law to approve contracts on the basis of the lowest responsible bidder. A school board can only act on the recommendation of the superintendent that are placed on an agenda of a voting meeting. At no time did I have any contact with or lobby for any contractor. It is prohibited by law and I adhered to the law.

Question: Did you fight to rehire a bus company whose driver supplied drugs to a Middletown student?

Answer: NO. As a board member, I voted to take action against the bus company because of this horrifying incident. I was pleased that an administrative law judge has disqualified this company from bidding on any bus routes for the school district.

Question: Did you make a motion to sign a contract for a cell tower on High School South property against the wishes of parents and the surrounding community?

Answer: Yes, I made the motion as a parliamentary procedure to put that agenda item on the table for discussion and voting. There were no members of the public that argued against the cell tower at that voting meeting.

Friday, December 21, 2007

Ebeneezer Corzine


We hate to interrupt your Christmas cheer, but Jon Corzine, who stated that he didn't come into office to be a number cruncher or a Scrooge, is proving that he is both.

Assembly Republican Leader Alex DeCroce announced today the the governor has just released his 106-page “School Funding Reform Act of 2008” and sent it to every member of the State Senate and Assembly via overnight delivery for their Christmas reading.

A public hearing is scheduled with the Assembly Budget and Education committees on Wednesday December 27. The Act is to be voted on by the lame duck session on January 7.

Minority Leader DeCroce said:

“The stage is being set, and it’s not for a Christmas pageant. Corzine and his allies in the Legislature fully intend to ramrod a thoroughly complicated and convoluted school funding formula through the Assembly and Senate on January 7th, the final day of the session, and they’re moving faster than the Polar Express down an icy slope,” said DeCroce, R-Morris and Passaic.

“If they wanted to travel the path of least resistance, they couldn’t have planned it any better,” DeCroce said. “Taxpayers and the parents of school-aged children are busy preparing for Christmas and enjoying the holiday season. Many stakeholders in this process – from teachers to school administrators – have already made travel arrangements for the holiday break. They won’t be around to read or comment on Corzine’s school funding formula, and that’s exactly what the administration wants. The fewer questions, the better as far as they’re concerned.”


In the Lobby reports that Tom Dunn, a lobbyist for the state superintendents association said, "They're like a used car salesman. They want to sell it to you at night. They figure they'll pass it between Christmas and New Year's so no one will see the dings and scratches in the formula."

There is no reason to rush this important program through the lame duck session, other than the fact that Corzine wants to force the new legislature to approve his asset monetization scam on the new legislature despite the fact that 60% of New Jersey residents oppose it.

This governor is dangerous and dishonest. The legislators of both parties should put him in his place and not even show up in Corzinegrad, the city formerly known as Trenton, until January 8th.

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Stakeholders?

The Governor unveiled his super secret school funding plan today.

From Corzine's press release:

"Education Commissioner Lucille E. Davy noted that the details of the formula released today are the result of more than a year of intensive work by department and administration officials, legislators and stakeholders."


Who are these stakeholders? NJEA members and officials, no doubt. School administrators too.

In reality, who is not a stakeholder when in comes to school funding in New Jersey? Everyone is. Why on earth would this plan be worked on intensively for more than a year, by people who get paid by it, with no input from the majority who will pay for it?

The announcement on the NJEA's website starts out,

"The debate over a new public school funding formula for New Jersey has officially begun."


Corzine obviously wants this to be a very short debate.

The plan calls for $530 million dollars in new spending, not including spending for a future mandated pre-kindergarten programs for 3 and 4 year olds.

There is absolutely no mention of cutting back spending in the Abbott Districts. These districts spend on average tens of thousands more per student that non-Abbotts. How can any serious person not look to cut waste, fraud and abuse from those districts.

Also missing is any mention of a consolidation of New Jersey's 613 school districts.

This a a joke. The only way the Governor could possibly get this passed is to do so during a lame duck session, which is coincidentally during the Christmas season.

That's why the secrecy.

Be sure to check out InTheLobby for more on Corzine's secrecy.

This governor is dangerous.

Thursday, December 13, 2007

You Better Watch Out, You’re Going to Cry, Corzine Claws in Going to Town

While you a busy celebrating and preparing to celebrate what I hope is a joyous holiday, Governor Corzine and the state legislature are pushing through a corrupt socialist agenda that will have a profound impact on your life. Things are so bad in Trenton that I’m beginning to sound like Gordon Bishop.

Most troubling is the proposed new school funding formula. School funding in New Jersey is at the heart the fiscal disaster that New Jersey has become and should be reformed. Currently, 31 urban school districts receive over half of the state’s funding for education, while the other 600 districts are left to fend for themselves. Your state income taxes go to fund the schools in those 31 districts, while your sky rocketing property taxes pay for the schools in your town. The 31 urban districts spend over $22, 000 per year per child in the name of education while the rest of the state spends about $11,000.00 per child.

Rather than reform a broken system with accountability and equity, Corzine is proposing to expand what is not working, and he’s attempting to rush it through the lame duck session of the legislature with little discussion. Corzine won’t even tell the legislature what their voting on until the last minute, but what he’s told New Jersey so far is that no school district will receive less state funding than they do now, that he will spend about $500 million more on education than he did last year and that school districts will be mandated to provide pre-kindergarten classes. In nutshell, he’s proposing a massive expansion of the school system with no improvement to the inequities of the system and no explanation of how we’ll be paying for it.

Before you send your children off to that mandatory pre-school or to day care, you’ll have to get that bundle of joy a flu shot. Babies as young as 6 months old must get a flu shot or no day care for them. This mandate by the Public Health Council, with the consent of the state Health Commissioner. I don’t remember voting for a Public Health Council or a Health Commissioner. I didn’t even know we had them. Assemblywoman Charlotte Vandervalk, a Republican from Bergen County has proposed legislation that would allow parents to opt out of the mandatory vaccines by submitting a form to the local health department. Her bill is going no where in the lame duck legislature.

Also on the lame duck agenda: The death penalty is gone. Many might think that is a good thing. Perhaps it is. I have mixed thoughts and emotions about it. It would have been good to have a public debate about it and to have it be an issue in the election. That might have increased voter turnout. Our government won’t tell us what they really have planned during an election. That would make serious issues “political footballs” and might increase participation. No, our government would prefer to keep you comatose with their horse poo rhetoric during elections and then sneak their agenda through when you’re not looking. It doesn’t seem to matter much that the death penalty was authorized in the state constitution by a vote of the people.

Paid family leave is also on the agenda. You remember that debate in the election, don’t you? Nope. No one talked about it because it wasn’t on the table. It was locked in a desk waiting for the polls to close. 10 weeks off per year, with government pay, to take care of a sick family member. One legislator said this program will one day be as important in our society as Social Security. Great, just what we need. Another underfunded entitlement program for the masses to get addicted to so the future legislatures can raid the trust fund to fill a bloated budget. Fortunately, the business community has created enough pressure to slow this one down, but it could still happen.

All of this and more from a legislature that couldn’t do much besides debate how many license plates we should have on our cars since they closed down the government and raised the sales tax 14%. What a difference an election makes. January 8 can’t get here fast enough. Then we can deal with Corzine Claws’s massive borrowing plan, toll road monetization, and a 150% increase in tolls.

Happy Holidays.

Also published in The Courier and The Bayonne Evening Star-Telegram

Saturday, January 03, 2009

Suggested Spending Cuts Courtesy of the Republican Legislators

Last week Governor Corzine complained whined that the mean Republicans should have come to his office rather than take him to court to force him to reveal his planned budget cuts. Maybe Corzine's staff just wouldn't let the Republicans through and didn't give him the message that the Republicans stopped by.

Well, the Governor still needs help and is working through the weekend to come up with spending cuts to announce on Monday. His union friends have made it clear that they will be no help at all.

The Republicans in the Legislature are still willing to help. Governor, if you are reading, here is what you would have heard if you'd met with Senator Thom Kean and Speaker Alex DeCroce:

MAJOR SAVINGS

1. Special Municipal Aid $107,305,000

Over the past six years, a handful of municipalities received state aid from a program whose funding increased from $38 million to more than $145 million. At the same time aid for other municipalities has basically been held flat. The Special Municipal Aid Program has been the subject of harsh criticism in a recent State Auditor’s Report which noted: (1) aid has been awarded without any application process; (2) no objective criteria exists to guide awards; (3) financial recovery plans for recipients have not been prepared as required by law; (4) hearings have not been held to determine if towns should be subject to a fiscal review board as required by law; and (5) grants recommended by staff are subject to “managerial override” (political manipulation). It is clear that the original purpose of the program is no longer adhered to and it has become nothing more than a “fund” for politically-connected municipalities.

Certain municipalities receive annual and increased funding from the program even though the program was originally intended to provide temporary assistance to help municipalities through short-term fiscal problems. For example, Union City received a four-fold increase in funding this year, despite having spent public funds in the past to support questionable expenses. Despite being a distressed city and receiving millions of dollars of distressed cities aid, Union City has been able to pay for several municipal swimming pools and cover a $500,000 jury award paid to a detective who was demoted for political reasons.

There remains a need for funding to address true emergencies in distressed areas, but the amount available six years ago remains the appropriate level for funding the program.


2. Reasonable Increases for Certain Former Abbott Districts $105,070,173


Certain former Abbott and Abbott-Rim school districts are slated to receive state aid increases that are far in excess of the inflation rate, and as high as 20%. There are 23 of these districts, including several such as Newark, that are receiving increases outside the new school funding formula, pursuant to budget language inserted by the Governor, without explanation. The increases are being provided without an individual assessment of the district’s needs. In addition, these 23 districts have seen their state aid generously increase by 30% since 2002. In the recent past, aid amounts have been deemed adequate and constitutional by the courts, so there appears to be no constitutional reason for the increases above and beyond past amounts.

The Department of Education has made no attempt to make sure state aid to these districts is well spent. In response to a request submitted by Republicans to the Department seeking payroll information for these schools, the Department acknowledged it does not keep nor does it have the requested information for these schools. Past reviews of these districts have identified: high administrative costs; blatant patronage positions; gym teachers, drama teachers and French teachers making in excess of $100,000, and even a $122,000 public information officer.

For example, the Harrison School District in Hudson County is slated to receive a 12% increase in funding next year, even though its state aid has increased by 60% during the past six years. Such an increase for a school district that has already been receiving dramatic increases for the past six years is patently unfair. Additionally, it should be noted that the people of Harrison Town don’t even get a chance to vote for their school board members. They are appointed by a mayor whose administration has been roundly criticized in newspapers for top-heavy administration and corruption. Other audits of these districts indicate that up to 25% of what they receive is undocumented, unnecessary or wasteful.

Capping state aid growth to 2% for all Abbott and Abbott-Rim districts that have seen solid increases in recent years is only fair at a time when many other communities are facing aid cuts. Capping the increases will also allow time for additional funds to be spent in a rational manner.

3. Procurement Reform $90,000,000

In a recent bipartisan meeting of legislators working to identify budget savings, the head of New Jersey's procurement office noted that if we saved just “10% off the price of only 15% of more than $6 billion” of annual procurement costs for goods and services, then the State would save $90 million. Stated another way, procurement reform should be able to easily reduce by 1.5% the price of the State's goods and services. That goal is more than achievable and Legislators from both parties have repeatedly offered to support whatever changes in procurement laws may be needed to effectuate savings and efficiencies. Change has been far too slow even though most reforms to procurement can be implemented immediately, without legislation.

First, the State should dramatically reduce its procurement of goods and services without advertising for competitive proposals and bids. The practice of no-bid contracts restricts open and fair competition and drives up prices. Procurement without advertising is made possible by the Department of Treasury when it approves requests for waivers from competitive advertising - which the department is responsible for approving even when the department is the one requesting the waiver. More than $446 million of purchasing was done in 2006 outside of competitive advertising for proposals and bids. As one example of this type of abuse, the Department of Treasury gave itself a waiver from competitive advertising for legal services associated with Governor Corzine’s monetization proposal and then only solicited bids from the most expensive law firms in the country, resulting in a $548 per hour contract that cost the taxpayers in excess of $5 million.

Second, major construction procurement and building projects subsidized by the State should be more closely examined before they begin and be subject to a disinterested third party review. The EnCap project is perhaps the best example of a project that was allowed to begin without adequate scrutiny. School construction projects also have been prime examples of major construction projects undertaken without adequate review. Greater up-front scrutiny of major construction projects could prevent the next EnCap or the next school funding debacle.

Third, the Governor's Office of Policy or the Counsel's Office should become more engaged in reviewing proposed procurements by departments and agencies to prevent nonessential spending. During the Senate and Assembly Republican's review of just a fraction of equipment purchases by various departments, obvious examples of nonessential purchase orders were found, including: a $35,000 World War II spotlight for the Department of Environmental Protection; an $18,000 "trinkets order" for the Department of Community Affairs; several $10,000 gym sets and a half dozen $650 customized cigarette lighters for prison inmates; tens of thousands of dollars for top-of-the-line $600 phones for several departments when more modest purchases would have sufficed; and excessively expensive office renovations. A quick, third party check on proposed departmental purchase orders by the Governor's Office would undoubtedly prevent many of the more egregious purchase orders from being pursued in the first place.

Fourth, agencies must require more regular invoices from hourly service providers such as lawyers and more closely scrutinize bills. As an example of where this would have made a significant difference, private lawyers handling EnCap dealings and whistleblower lawsuits were permitted to submit bills for services nine months after beginning work. The result was that virtually all billable hours were paid. Billable time included obviously unnecessary and excessive work which could have been stopped sooner if bills were reviewed on a timely basis.

4. Pension and Health Benefits Reforms $85,000,000

The Legislature has attempted to make fair and equitable reforms to state worker pension and benefit policies. Governor Corzine has thwarted many of these changes, only allowing for relatively modest changes. Further changes should be pursued.

Republicans are recommending that the retirement age for prospective government employees enrolled in the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) by raised from 60 to 62. This will greatly reduce the system’s unfunded liability and will put the public employees’ retirement system more in line with the private sector. It also reflects increased life expectancy.

Second, the current pension formula that determines payouts is based on a three-year average of an employee’s highest pay. In the past this has made it easier to “boost” pensions beyond what has been earned. Republicans propose a pension formula based on a five-year average.

Third, state employees receive three extra holidays that the federal government does not recognize. The number of state holidays for State employees should be reduced to match those given by the federal government. This will lower overtime costs and make State services more accessible to taxpayers.

Fourth, the Benefit Review Task Force issued a report in late 2005 proposing changes in employee and retiree benefits and documenting the savings attributable to each change. One change, which has since been partially implemented, was to increase the employee and retiree contributions to health insurance to 10% of the cost of a base plan. That proposal alone was documented as saving State taxpayers $206 million. The Corzine Administration ultimately embraced a different approach, requiring employees to contribute 1.5% of salary towards the cost of their health plans, which required State employees to contribute far less than could have been saved under the Task Force recommendation.

Possible other reforms include: allowing vested employees to opt into a 401K style retirement program which may be attractive to employees and taxpayers; increasing the annual salary that triggers pension credits beyond the current threshold of $1,500 which is unfair to employees and taxpayers; and increasing the threshold of hours worked to become eligible for health benefits to prevent certain politically connected employees, who do as little as attend one or two meetings per month, from getting health insurance.

Between these and the other proposals being advanced by Senators Sweeney, Buono and others, a benefit at least five times greater than the recommended $85 million into the pension system can be accomplished to bolster the health of the pensions system.

The proposal here is to embrace work on a bipartisan basis and adopt a combination of the above proposals to reduce benefit contributions by $85 million. The combination of substantial additional reforms and a modest reduction in the FY 2009 contributions does far more to bring the pension system into balance in a manner that is fair to rank and file workers and taxpayers alike. In contrast, Governor Corzine has almost exclusively stressed making larger taxpayer contributions to the retirement systems as the means by which unfunded liabilities in pension and post retirement health benefits should be addressed.

5. Eliminate Political Appointees $68,481,000

The Governor has touted an early retirement program to reduce the State employee count. Early retirement programs have failed time and time again in the past and have actually resulted in the State simply increasing its unfunded liabilities in the pension systems.

Republicans have a better way to shrink the payroll – eliminate patronage and managerial positions.

Despite claims to the contrary by Governor Corzine, there remains substantial patronage and top heavy administration in State Government. Some of the people in these positions were hired by Governor Corzine himself. For example, a former County Clerk was recently hired as the Deputy Executive Director of the Board of Cosmetology and Hairstyling. A former Executive Director of the Arizona Democrat Party was recently hired as a public relations expert at the Department of Environmental Protection. A campaign worker whose job included taping opponents at various functions was recently hired as an aid to the Governor. Those are only three of hundreds of examples of positions that could be eliminated with little or no disruption of public services.

If the Administration eliminated 2/3 of the employees in the following titles, they would save $68,481,000 in salary and benefits: State Supervising Photographer, Government Representative, Confidential Aide, Aide to the Governor, Senior Executive Service, Legislative Liaison, Confidential Secretary, Confidential Assistant and Administrative Assistant. It is not claimed that all of the employees in these positions should be fired. In fact, some of these people perform valuable functions, but political appointees are clearly employed in these titles – most of which are outside civil service laws and competitive hiring requirements.

Firing political employees who are not protected by civil service is a far easier, more sensible, and more efficient way to reduce the workforce without promising unwarranted benefits through an early retirement program.

6. Phase-in aid increases for greater than 50% state aid school districts $20,700,000

There are 33 school districts (non-Abbott, non-Abbott Rim) that receive State aid totaling more than 50% of the revenue to support their budgets. Twenty of these districts are slated to receive increases far exceeding inflation. It can hardly be considered fair to increase these communities aid far beyond inflation while aid to other communities is cut. This proposal would hold these communities to reasonable increases of 4% instead of up to 20%.

7. County Prosecutor Funding Initiative Pilot Program $8,000,000

This program provides a subsidy to four counties (Camden, Essex, Hudson, and Mercer) based on nothing but pure partisan concerns. It is nothing more than an unfair and unbalanced slush fund disguised as a policy concern.

8. Elimination of the Department of Public Advocate $6,670,000


Eliminating this department, which didn't even exist until recently, and transferring its essential functions to other departments will save the state considerable funding without jeopardizing essential State services. Spending for the programs operated out of this department have increased from the $13.164 million expended during FY 2005 to the $19.20 million recommended for FY 2008. In addition to substantial administrative savings achievable by eliminating this department, there are carry forward accounts available for some of the functions that should be transferred to other departments.

9. Elimination of Compensation to Members of Commissions
and Boards $4,000,000


Hundreds of politically connected people who sit on various state boards and commissions and attend infrequent meetings, receive full-time pension credit, as if they are full time employees. Individuals need to earn just $1,500 a year to be eligible for a year of pension credit, provided they were hired prior to recent pension reforms. Compensation should be reduced to a level so that cumulative payments throughout the year would not exceed the $1,500 needed to earn pension credit. This option would eliminate pension and benefits for more than 250 members of various commissions and boards who receive just enough compensation to be eligible for credit in the State pension system. Examples include the Real Estate Commission, Public Employee Relations Commission, the various licensing boards in the Department of Law and Public Safety and local boards such as the County Tax Boards. Total budget savings, would include $3 million in salary savings and $1 million attributable to a board members who statutorily receive health benefits.

10. Board of Public Utilities $4,000,000

$4 million received by the BPU should be returned to the General Fund to offset indirect costs incurred by the State, including defense of a whistle blower lawsuit and criminal investigations and audits. This can be achieved by cutting confidential employees at BPU, whose number has increased by 40 over the past several years. In addition, BPU leases expensive office space in Newark. A portion of the premises could be subleased and BPU could move to cheaper office space elsewhere.

11. State Cars $2,100,000

The proposed budget assumes that the state will hold title to 15,544 vehicles. This is an increase of 144 since January 2007. The budget also assumes that 2 additional mechanics will be on the payroll to service the additional vehicles. Treasury, the Department responsible for the State Central Motor Pool, should evaluate who is driving these vehicles and if they merit vehicle assignment. Eliminating a small portion of the fleet as well as placing a moratorium on purchasing additional vehicles (not including the replacement of state police vehicles) will save the cost of new vehicles and cut fuel costs and reduce claims against the Vehicle Claims Liability Fund.

12. Governor's Contingency Fund $600,000

The Governor's Contingency Fund began more than 100 years ago for the purpose of allowing the Governor to make funds available to address true emergencies. It was politicized by former Governors McGreevey and Codey. Recently spending from the account has been more reasonable. For example, small amounts of money have been expended from the account to recognize fallen soldiers who were serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. Carry forward funding is available for these types of expenditures. But, other spending should be eliminated and true emergencies should be funded by the Legislature. Additionally, the account has a balance of more than $1.5 million.

13. Funding for Rutgers' Athletic Facilities $500,000

This funding is specifically designated for capital projects for athletic facilities at Rutgers, New Brunswick, despite the Governor's pledge that no state funding will be used for this purpose.


14. New Jersey Law Revision Commission $400,000

The New Jersey Law Revision Commission was established in 1985 to promote and encourage the clarification and simplification of the laws of New Jersey. This function can adequately be performed by existing staff in the Office of Legislative Services.

15. Sports and Exposition Authority (NJSEA) $350,000

The NJSEA gave 9 employees (executives) salary bonuses worth a total of $350,000 annually. The bonuses were 1/3 of each executive's annual pay. Additionally, the NJSEA retreated from George Zoffingers' cost cutting initiatives and hired numerous nonessential employees. At the same time, the state subsidy of the NJSEA is increasing.

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

FY 2011 Budget Solutions: Fundamental Reform to Rebuild New Jersey’s Economy

Trenton, NJ – Faced with the daunting combination of a soaring deficit years in the making and the continued effects of the national recession, Governor Chris Christie today proposed a $29.3 billion state budget that fundamentally alters spending habits while preserving core services and social safety nets and advancing fiscal reforms to put New Jersey back on the path to prosperity.

Chief among the Governor’s proposed reforms – to shield taxpayers from excessive local spending and tax increases – is a constitutional amendment to impose hard caps of 2.5 percent on municipal, county and school district property tax increases. Combined with other reforms, including those planned for public employee pension and health benefits, Governor Christie is providing municipalities and school districts a tool kit of reforms to control spending and property taxes.

“It is time for every level of government to accept the severity of our fiscal problems, understand and take responsibility for what got us here, and resolve to fix the problems through a fundamental shift in priorities and thinking,” Governor Christie said. “It will not be easy, and it will certainly make some people unhappy. But the alternative – more budget tricks and gimmickry to mask our fiscal problems – risks leaving our children and our children’s children with a legacy of crushing debt and economic decline.”

Governor Christie’s Fiscal Year 2011 Budget proposal, as announced today before a joint session of the Legislature, cuts spending across hundreds of state programs and operations, reducing the current year anticipated state-supported spending of $29.86 billion by $1.6 billion or 5.3 percent. It is also $2.9 billion or 8.9 percent less than the adjusted FY 2010 appropriation of $32.1 billion, when non-recurring federal stimulus funding is included.

From a full-funding starting point, all reductions amount to more than $10.73 billion, illustrating the severity of the structural budget deficit that resulted from the relentless expansion of state government over the last decade. Debt growth has accelerated under the crushing, cumulative weight of our overgenerous pension and benefits obligations, aid increases to municipalities and schools have flowed without reform, and the chronic use of debt and non-recurring funding sources have hobbled the budget balancing process.

Even under these enormous fiscal pressures, the budget proposal strives to protect those who are most in need. The budget:

• Preserves the health care safety net by increasing hospital Charity Care from $605 million to $665 million;

• Continues enrollment and benefits for all eligible children into both Medicaid and NJ FamilyCare;

• Preserves access to medications for seniors by maintaining program eligibility for prescription drugs;

• Expands the food stamp program to 185 percent of the federal poverty level;

• Continues to maintain funding for welfare grants to families; and

• Keeps New Jersey parks and beaches open.

The budget proposal reforms and converts the Homestead Rebate Program into a direct property tax credit that ends the costly and fiscally irresponsible practice of borrowing more than a billion dollars each year to send out checks.

School and Municipal Aid

Closing the funding gap, however, still meant extremely difficult choices that will impact funding to municipalities and schools. Nonetheless, Governor Christie seeks to implement meaningful reforms that will blunt the impact of these aid reductions.

Faced with the loss of more than $1 billion in federal stimulus funds used as one-time funding for education, this year’s spending plan dedicates nearly $70 million more in state funds to education aid than last year. Still, the use of stimulus funds last year without a plan for replacing that funding means New Jersey school districts will face a net reduction of $820 million. Great care was taken to ensure that no one school district would lose more in formula aid than 4.99 percent of its original Fiscal 2010 budget.

The proposed budget finds savings from a $446 million reduction in municipal and county aid. The municipal aid decline was filtered to ensure that communities would see no more than a $250 increase in local property tax bills. At the same time municipalities, local school districts and higher education institutions will be given a Tool Kit of mandate relief and regulatory flexibility that includes:

• Constitutional caps on spending and local taxes,

• Pension and benefits reform,

• Civil service reform,

• Collective bargaining reform, and

• Management reform

Budget savings totaling $2.85 billion appear across virtually every state program and department and the Legislature. To balance the budget, the Administration also had to forgo a more than $3 billion contribution to the state’s defined benefits plan. These are not choices the governor wants to make, but tough medicine is needed because the disease is so severe.

“There is no sugar-coating this budget,” said Governor Christie. “It is a painful but vital step vital if our state is to regain its financial and economic footing. We are truly at a crossroads. We must make the right choices, come together and act decisively at this place in time or forfeit an opportunity that may never come again. We cannot allow a lack of vision, courage or political will to supplant the responsibility we owe to our citizens and our children.”

Thursday, December 13, 2007

More Facts About Corzine's School Funding Proposal

The proposal increases state spending by $532 million which state taxpayers will have to pick up - when our State budget is already so strained. It is a 7.3% increase in the $7.8 billion portion of the State budget dedicated to school aid. The increase will trigger higher State taxes or encourage the toll road gimmick.

Four Democrat machine counties (Hudson, Camden, Essex, and Middlesex) are getting larger increases than any other county in the entire State. These four counties receive increases of $210 million - almost half half the total funding increase.

Union City, with less than 70,000 residents, will get a $20 million increase in funding next year when there has been considerable evidence put forth in the last year about patronage and wasteful spending there. By way of reference, the $20 million increase in aid for Union City and its people is more than the combined increases for all of the 91 school districts and the nearly 1 million people in legislative districts 10 (Ocean), 11 (Monmouth), 39 (Bergen) and 40 (Bergen).

Even in some Republican areas where there appear to be spotty increases, such as district 12 in Monmouth County, the funding formula is still grossly unfair. Total school aid in for the 19 school districts in legislative district 12 will be $155 million - this compares to roughly the same amount ($149 million) just for Union City alone.

Places like Jersey City which exempt lots of property from paying anything at all in property taxes towards schools through sweetheart giveaways to builders, will receive an increase of $8 million - bringing their total aid to $419 million. They will permitted to continue giving away sweetheart deals which exempt wealthy property owners from making payments to their own schools.

Source: NJGOP

Monday, April 13, 2009

A Band Aid Where Surgery Is Required

Education funding is New Jersey is fundamentally flawed and inequitable. There is nothing "thorough and efficient" about it.

The situation in Loch Arbour and Ocean Township, where Loch Arbour residents are facing the doubling of their property taxes because Corzine's new school funding formula required that their school taxes be based on the value of their property rather than the number of children they send to Ocean Township schools is a symptom of the most serious fiscal problem facing New Jersey tax payers.

Senator Sean Kean has proposed that the new funding method be phased in over time. The Asbury Park Press has endorsed Kean's idea. This may be equitable in the short term, but it is a band aid.

New Jersey's Republican leadership, our gubernatorial candidates and legislative leaders should distinguish themselves as reformers and propose a fundamental overhaul of our educational system and its funding.

So far neither Chris Christie or Steve Lonegan have proposed anything other than better band aids.

The word "education" does not even appear in the NJ Senate Republicans "Common Sense Plan for an Affordable New Jersey" The word "school" appears, but only with a proposal to eliminate obscenely excessive superintendent retirement packages. Easy pickings of the low hanging fruit.

The Republican Assembly caucus does no better. They use the phrase "fiscal integrity" but fail to address the most compelling problem, education funding.

Basically, Republicans are promising to do a better job managing a fundamentally flawed system than the Democrats are doing. It is little wonder that voters can't distinguish between NJ Democrats and NJ Republicans.

Chris Christie has been doing a good job on the stump talking about how Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell has been picking New Jersey's pocket by attracting businesses over the border. Christie, Lonegan, Kean, Jr, and DeCroce should study how Pennsylvania, Maryland and 46 other states are educating their children and come up with an honest plan to Save Jersey from the current insanity.

There is nothing to fear from the NJEA. They are not going to support Republicans anyway.

Thursday, July 27, 2006

Special Legislative Session. Will it make a difference?

So the boys (and a few girls) will be back in town, Trenton, that is, for a Special Legislative session to address property tax reform.

Does anyone believe anything will really be reformed? If so, will the reforms be better than what we've got. This blogger fears that more damage than good may be done, if anything is done.

Govenor Corzine is advocating consolidation of municipalities and school boards. This is a notion that has been advocated by Democrats and Republicans for years, from former Assembly Speaker Alan Karcher, author of New Jersey's Multiple Municipal Madness, to more recently Senator Joe Kryillos. I like the idea. 566 towns and 615 school boards sure seems like madness. If we were starting New Jersey today, would be organize it this way? Probably not.

The problem with the Governor's proposal is that he wants to borrow $7 billion against the anticipated revenues from the new sales tax increase in order to give the municipalities incentives to consolidate. I never worked for Goldman Sachs, but I can imagine the banker and lawyers celebrating at Harry's over how big their bonuses will be if Jon boy gets that one through.

Didn't Corzine just shut down the government in order to get this sales tax increase that we needed to balance the budget without gimmicks? This sure sounds like a gimmick to me.

Do we have to pay our municipal politicians $7 billion to give up their fiefdoms? Maybe that won't be enough if they each get the deal that Sharp James got.

Consolidation will really be its own reward, to the taxpayers. That $7 billion will have to be paid back with future tax increases.

The Asbury Park Press reports that along with consolidation that the Governor wants a school funding formula that based on children's needs, not districts needs. Again, an admirable goal, but the devil is in the details. Will the Governor have the courage and clout to stand up to the NJEA the way he did to Speaker Joe Roberts? If so, here's a formula that make sense: Give the parents or guardians every child a voucher for $10,000 payable at the school of their choice, and let the schools compete for the best students and teachers. Instead of selling or leasing the NJ Turnpike, sell the schools and then license the schools so that only those that meet appropriate standards and qualifications are eligible for vouchers. Within 10 years the "cost" of educating children will decline to $8000 per pupil and the schools will be making of profit of $2,000 per pupil. Goldmam Sachs and the like can make their commissions and fees on taking the schools public rather than floating bonds. This would work great for the kids, but it will never happen in a culture that rewards and protects mediocrity.

Monday, March 15, 2010

The 2.5% Solution

Published reports indicate that Governor Chris Christie is set to propose constitution amendments creating a "hard" 2.5% cap on property taxes to replace the current 4% swiss cheese cap. The tax could only be increased by local voter referendum.

He would also cap state spending increases at 2.5%.

I applaud the goal, but wonder if a constitution amendment is the way to do it.

Can Christie get a super majority of the Democratic legislature to go approve such an amendment?

What about inflation? Many economists expect that when our economy rebounds from the current recession that our next crisis will be Carter era type inflation or worse given all the money that Washington is spending. Inflation of 12.5% would be mean property tax and state spending reductions of 10% in "real dollars." Given the recent rise in property taxes, that would not be so bad. However, making the cap constitutional would make it very difficult to tinker with should doing so be genuinely appropriate.

The other problem I have with a constitutional amendment to achieve property tax caps it that such an amendment further institutionalizes the current property tax structure, keeping schools being funded by local property taxes.

Chrisite has said he will put an end to unfunded state mandates.

Public school spending is the ultimate unfunded mandate. Under current law, a community with per pupil education costs that obscenely exceed the state average can not make the very rational economic decision to stop funding an inefficient school system and give the money to parents to send their children to private schools or another school district.

New Jersey will have the highest property taxes in the nation for as long as the state mandates that local property taxes fund public school and as long as the state mandates the curriculum and programs of the schools.

Christie is fulfilling his promise to turn Trenton upside down. I hope he turns it upside down, then grabs it by the ankles and shakes.

Creating a new education funding formula that does not rely on property taxes would truly be transformative. If we are going to tinker with the constitution, let's do that.

Thursday, December 27, 2007

NJEA opposes school funding formula


Judith Cambria writes on NJ Voices:

NJEA said, "We have concluded that it is filled with SIGNIFICANT, NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES for ALL of New Jersey's school districts".

If the NJEA doesn't like it, there must be something good about it. The Education Law Center, who gave us the Abbott districts also doesn't like it. This plan must be pretty good after all! Just kidding. Increasing spending $530 million right off the bat, with another $800 million to come, with no funding and a $3billion "structural deficit" will not improve education and will only ensure "asset monetization" and huge toll increases.

This issue is far to important to be rushed through the legislature without a complete vetting. The legislature should follow Corzine's lead, and take a Caribbean vacation for the rest of the year.

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Anna Little's Comments at Today's Freeholder Workshop

Freeholder Anna Little made the following comments at today's workshop meeting. Today's meetings are Little's final public meetings as a Freeholder, prior to her term expiring.

"I would like to take a moment to reflect upon the many rewardiing experiences that have enriched my life since becoming your Monmouth County Freeholder February 26, 2006. These experiences have not only offered me the opportunity to give back to Monmouth County, my home, but they have also contributed to my growth as an individual and as a governmental representative, your elected office holder.

In 2006 my Freeholder Assignment was Finance.

After suggesting 5% - 10% budget cuts, a goal of keeping budget increases below the rate of inflation, and convening a Budget Review Committee, I participated with fellow Freeholders and staff members in the open discussion of direct departmental budget cuts and the effect upon county departments and the tax levy.

Impressed with Rob Clifton’s commitment to developing a shared services department
with a grant from the state of New Jersey, I was excited about taking part in a shared services round table armed with a list of shared services opportunities already existing in Monmouth County government.

We investigated and later that year began using biodiesel fuel in county vehicles
highlighting the potential cost savings, taking advantage of incentive grants from the state of New Jersey, and also benefitting the environment.

And the highlight of 2006 for me was hosting the Economic Development Summit on
September 29. This exciting event brought together top business, government and civic
officials to explore programs to preserve high-paying jobs and to attract new ones in
Monmouty County. We heard from municipal and business leaders and individual citizens
committed to preserving and enhancing our wonderful way of life. Some have already
spun off into discussions of their own regarding topics and issues raised at the Summit. Others have gained renewed enthusiasm for projects they had already initiated. I am very proud of all of these efforts.

In 2007 my Freeholder Assignment was changed to Administrative Services:

(Belford Ferry, Brookdale Community College, Buildings and Grounds, Clerk-Board of
Chosen Freeholders, County Administrator, County Counsel, Economic Development and
Tourism, Information Services, Insurance Office, Personnel, Public Information, Reclamaton Center, Vocational Board of Education)

I was privileged to support the dock and roll program between Middletown train station and
the Belford Ferry.

Brookdale Community College accepted my proposals to consider revenue producing
opportunities when designing their capital improvement projects, and Monmouth County
educational institutions considered my suggestion to promote expansion of technology
related curriculum into technology and business incubation in Monmouth County. The
recent federal grant received at the Biotechnology vocational school is evidence of these efforts.

Committees of professionals have been created within Monmouth County to evaluate and
make recommendations regarding awards of contracts via the fair and open process. While no process can produce perfect results, these committees further professionalize government operations.

Board meeting miinutes have been posted on the world wide web. This is evidence of a
growing commitment to transparency in government.

Monthly reports on legal expenses have been instituted with a commitment to explaining the sources of legal expenses and resulting financial awards. Steps have been taken to prepare for a full analysis of a potential for reducing expenses over time.

I feel privileged to have participated in discussions regarding establishing a salary guide for all county positions via the department of personnel and to establish an approved procedure for posting, interviewing and hiring for all county positions.

The department of public information's commitment to a public information campaign is
clear, and should define its purpose as accountability to the public, improving public trust in government, and performing a public service in related subjects.

I hope the Reclamation Center will explore a possibility of expanding of its methane gas to electricity project to generating and distributing electricity to fully offset electriciy usage in Freehold Borough county offices to eliminate these expenses.

I also hope that the Vocational Board of Education will consider convening a meeting with all school administrators in the County of Monmouth to provide specific input to legislators regarding a new school funding formula.

However, the highlight of 2007 for me was selecting a new county administrator via a
historically novel process involving an RFQ, widespread advertisement, and a professional interview process.

In closing, I wish to thank members of the Board of Chosen Freeholders with whom I have served (Ted Narozanick, William Barham, Rob Clifton, Lillian Burry, Barbara McMorrow)and the staff in Monmouth County for providing me with these notable experiences over the last two years. I am truly indebted to you all for contributing to the person I have become today. Likewise, I must thank the people of Monmouth County for their trust, their votes and their support throughout my term as Freeholder. You have truly touched my heart."

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

New Jersey: Leading the Nation in Irony

By Mayor Mike Halfacre, Fair Haven

If it wasn’t so sad, it would be funny.

New Jersey Democratic officials, instead of taking “bold, meaningful action” here at home, are lobbying Washington D.C. for handouts. Governor Corzine thinks he is still at Goldman Sachs, but instead of leading a private investment bank to bankruptcy, he has led the State of New Jersey to its brink. Republicans are suing him to disclose his budget plans, but he won’t disclose them, perhaps because he has none. Instead, his only hope appears to be a Federal bailout.

In an Op-Ed Piece first published in the Washington Post, King Jon, presumably sticking his pinkie to the corner of his mouth in his best “Dr. Evil” voice, asks for 1 Trillion dollars, ($1,000,000,000,000.00) to go for infrastructure, housing, education, “safety net” programs and middle-class tax cuts. He says 20,000 people will get back to work for every billion dollars spent in infrastructure. Assemblyman Lou Greenwald, D-Camden, in an Op-Ed piece in the Asbury Park Press, also climbed into his DeLorean and activated the flux capacitor: “Rejuvenating consumer demand needs to begin with providing people with a paycheck. Investing in critical infrastructure projects can put thousands of residents back to work and give them the disposable income they need to stabilize their own situations, all the while jumpstarting New Jersey's economic engine.”

What these rocket scientists forget to mention is that not every ex-Wall Streeter or Bed, Bath and Beyond cashier knows how to operate a back hoe or an arc welder. Note to Jon and Lou: This isn’t 1933 when any former banker could pick up a shovel and dig a ditch.

Corzine’s Op-Ed piece followed up a story in which Education Czarina Lucille Davy complained about the “unfunded mandates” imposed on the State by No Child Left Behind, and how the Federal Government should increase spending because those unfunded mandates are unfair. The complaint is that New Jersey is considered by the Feds a “rich state” and the funding formula is unfair to “rich states”. Was she really able to put forth this argument with a straight face? Talk to the vast number of middle class school districts in the State of New Jersey, considered “rich” by Corzine, and ask about the “funding formula” developed by his Administration last year. The irony is delicious. (Of course, this argument also conveniently forgets to mention that Federal Education spending has increased, overall, under the Bush Administration)

Corzine goes on to say “…the states, local governments and the federal government must be full partners in the recovery process.” This is a bold statement. Never before has the State of New Jersey partnered with local governments. Sure, the State has bullied, bribed and attempted to bankrupt local governments, but never actually partner with them to find solutions. Trenton continually forces unfunded mandates down the throats of municipalities. The Democratic-led State Legislature is considering mandating new pension deferrals while towns are still trying to catch up on the last round of pension deferrals, imposing draconian, one-sided COAH obligations, Stormwater Management Regulations, and Highlands Act regulations, all without considering their impact on municipalities.

Now, when the State needs something from the Federal Government, Corzine wants to “partner up”? Where was he when the municipalities he cut aid to last year wanted to partner up?

The comparison of municipalities seeking relief from an entirely ineffective legislature last year, to Corzine seeking relief from an entirely ineffective Congress, is an apt one. There is a reason New Jersey continues to rank last in money back from Congress: Holt, Pallone, Lautenberg, Menendez and the rest of the Keystone Kops representing New Jersey, will, I am sure, deliver exactly what they always have: Nada. Zip. Zilch.

What will King Jon do then?

Presumably, he will come back to his “partners” the suburban municipalities, and continue to slash state aid, all the time crying poor, while catering to his labor union, democratic, big city base. It is time that the residents of the Great State of New Jersey said “Enough” and replaced this inept and embarrassing Executive Branch in 2009, as well as give control of the Assembly to a new wave of Republicans. This will hopefully be a first step toward the 2010 midterm elections, where the voters will get a chance to correct the obvious mistake of this past November.

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Prepared text of Gov. Jon Corzine's State of the State speech

Happy New Year and thank you all for attending today's State of the State.

Reverend Clergy; Senate President Codey; Speaker Roberts; Majority Leaders Sweeney and Watson Coleman; Minority Leaders Kean and DeCroce; Chief Justice Rabner and Justices of the Supreme Court; Members of the Legislature; Members of my Cabinet; Congressmen Pallone, Payne, Rothman, Holt, and Sires; Governors Florio, DiFrancesco, and Bennett;

A special welcome to Indian Consul General Prabhu Dayal. Consul General, all of us were saddened by the recent terrorist attacks in Mumbai. We pray that all those accountable will be brought to justice and that the community of Mumbai will soon heal.

Honored guests and my fellow New Jerseyans --

Today, as we assess the state of our state, and look ahead to the challenges of 2009, I cannot help but feel an overwhelming sense of pride in the people of New Jersey.

Despite the challenges of today's national economic crisis, the people of our state are pushing forward in building better schools ...
broadening access to health care ...
making our streets safer ...
and building a more secure world.

Our state has long been blessed by its deep well of talent and by the character of its people -- people who have built, in good times and bad, a tradition of achievement and excellence.

From the founding wisdom of Stockton and Kean ... to the genius of Edison and Einstein ... to the proud voices of Robeson and Springsteen...

From the poetry of Carlos Williams and the prose of Toni Morrison ... to the leadership of President Wilson and General Odierno ...
... New Jersey and the nation have been shaped by our state's extraordinary people.

This era is no exception.

Our determination remains strong -- our drive is undiminished -- and our work ethic knows no bounds.

We are a creative, "can-do" people who, with fortitude and spirit, will work through today's challenging times.

Despite the economic tsunami that's engulfing the nation, I believe that the character and fundamentals of our state are equal to any task we face.

We generate the highest incomes in the nation. We educate our children in schools that are the envy of others. We maintain a highly respected justice system.We provide a strong safety net for the most vulnerable.

And, we have always welcomed newcomers from other shores, embracing the value of diversity and pluralism.

Yes -- New Jersey is a state committed to achievement and excellence.

Now at a time of national crisis, New Jerseyans are leading the nation in confronting our security and economic challenges.

Last week I was in Iraq, where nearly 4,000 citizen-soldiers of our National Guard, Reserves, and active duty personnel are serving.

Today, we have the largest foreign deployment of New Jersey's National Guard since World War II.

With courage, discipline, and professionalism, our men and women in uniform are making steep sacrifices so that we might be safe. We are all grateful.

Major Dwayne Kelley was one of those citizen soldiers. Last year, he went to Iraq for his third tour of duty. He left behind a wife, two daughters, a mother, a sister and a brother -- a family bursting with pride for him.

But his tours in Iraq weren't the only job in which Major Kelley put his life on the line for his fellow citizens. Major Kelley was also Trooper Kelley.

Brought up in Willingboro ... raising his family in South Orange ... Kelley served more than 20 years in the State Police, where he attained the rank of detective sergeant first class as a counterterrorism expert, fluent in Arabic.

Major Kelley ... father and husband ... sadly was one of 10 people -- 4 Americans -- killed in a roadside bomb in Sadr City on June 24, 2008. Our hearts go out to his family.

His widow, Manita, and their daughter, Mushirah, intended to join us here today, but they had to tend to a family emergency.

Words cannot express their sacrifice ... their fortitude ... or their loss. God bless them.

Whether it's the brave men and women I met in Iraq ...or the food pantry volunteers -- including Assemblywoman Coyle -- I joined several weeks ago in Bound Brook ...
... or the advocacy and faith-based groups counseling people on how to modify their mortgages and stay in their homes ...
... or small business owners struggling to meet payroll each week ...

New Jerseyans are tough, and resilient, and we are fighting back against a national economic recession exceeded in depth and duration only by the Great Depression of the 1930s.

We see that spirit in every public school, every senior center, every hospital, and in every place where people come together, day-by-day, to reaffirm a basic truth: 'We are our brother's keeper -- we are our sister's keeper.'

People also came together last November 4th, when our citizens in record numbers voted overwhelmingly to elect Barack Obama our next president.

In doing so, our voters embraced a new vision for America -- a progressive vision we share in New Jersey. In fact, it's a vision we've been working to achieve for three years --
... a vision that we must responsibly share our economic bounty ... that all of our children deserve a thorough and efficient education ... that health care is a right ... that we have a moral responsibility to be good stewards of the Earth.

Barack Obama's vision is our vision.

And now, thankfully, starting next Tuesday, New Jerseyans have a partner in Washington -- a partner who will join us in pursuing a common vision.

Change is in the air. With that change, I truly believe that as a nation and as a state, our best days lie ahead. That said ... it's impossible to ignore the deep challenges we face today.

We have been in the grips of a national recession since the fall of 2007. Our country's financial system hovers near collapse. Home values, personal savings, and the securities markets have plunged.

The national unemployment rate has soared to over 7%, with expectations of a 9% to 10% rate in the year ahead. Our citizens' economic security has been compromised.

Our people did not cause this meltdown -- its causes are beyond their control and are national ... even global ... in scope.

The cost of this colossal economic meltdown is far more than the trillions of dollars of lost value in the securities markets and economic production -- it goes well beyond any batch of statistics. The cost must be understood in the pain and anxiety of our neighbors.

Last month, I attended an anti-poverty conference here in Trenton -- a conference where I heard three life stories of people struggling just to stay afloat in these troubling times.

A single mom told us that she lost her home to foreclosure because of a predatory mortgage.
She worked for 30 years as a corrections officer -- never did she imagine she would be out on the street.

A young man described how he lost his job, then his apartment, and then his ability to put food on his table. A young woman told us how she struggled to get critical health care after she lost her job and her insurance, and was being forced toward bankruptcy.

These three people were prepared to work hard and play by the rules.They were caught up in forces well beyond their control. And when good people are at the end of their rope, they need to know that government is there to lend a helping hand.

I wish I could say the impact of the national recession is limited to a few stories ... but it's not.
- Food pantry calls are up 30% to 40%.
- 48,000 New Jerseyans received foreclosure notices in 2008, and their ranks are growing.
- The number of unemployed and uninsured is exploding.

It is in this context that we have made the economy Priority #1, Priority #2, and Priority #3.

It is in the human context that we have initiated efforts to combat hunger, to provide home heating and utility assistance, to offer legal aid, and to address the foreclosure crisis through mediation and financial assistance.

Our foreclosure prevention initiatives are a model for the nation.

Similarly, New Jersey is at the forefront of the nation's efforts to provide healthcare to our citizens. When the Bush administration tried to kick 10,000 kids out of New Jersey's Family Care program ...we said 'no!'

Instead, we expanded our program to cover every child and enrolled more working and moderate-income families.

Thank you, Senator Vitale, for your leadership on broadening access to healthcare. The Senator knows, and we know, that getting people insured saves money ... and saves lives.

Another critical element of our health system is our network of community health centers, which serve almost 350,000 uninsured or underinsured New Jerseyans.

We need these clinics today more than ever, as more people lose their insurance or struggle with their out-of-pocket expenses.

That's why we've increased our reimbursement rates and provided additional grant funding.

One network that will be receiving grant support is Community Health Care, which operates 17 facilities in Cumberland, Gloucester, and Cape May Counties.

Community will be using these funds to expand innovative prenatal care, helping women maintain healthy pregnancies while reducing infant mortality.

We are joined today by Dr. Michelle Torchia, who has made healthy pregnancies and babies her life's mission at Community. Thank you, Dr. Torchia, for all that you do.

I'm proud that the State has been able to partner with private institutions like Community Health Care even as we had to make major cuts to balance the budget.

As you recall, the fiscal 2009 budget cut spending by $600 million year-over-year, as we anticipated a gathering national recession and shrinking revenues.

By the close of the calendar year, the deepening recession had required us to cut spending by another $800 million. That's a total of $1.4 billion in cuts in this fiscal year alone.
Let me repeat -- $1.4 billion ...
... not in the rate of growth, but in absolute dollars.

It's been painful, and we've had to make many ugly choices. But together with my partners in the Legislature, we are making the hard choices.

Senator Buono and Assemblymen Greenwald have been especially diligent in taking on this challenge, and I thank them for their partnership.

Just as we've taken action to discipline spending and shore up New Jersey's safety net for our most vulnerable ... we've also built a foundation for future economic recovery.

We began by offering small and mid-size businesses $3,000 for each new job created over the next year.

Additionally, wherever I go, small business owners tell me that they're having trouble getting loans. That's why we're encouraging new lending through innovative credit facilities and placing deposits with New Jersey's community-oriented banks.

Most importantly, we are creating jobs by accelerating public investments in roads, bridges, school construction, and the new mass transit tunnel under the Hudson.

In the next year alone, we're committing $4.7 billion in high-return investments ... saving or creating as many as 42,000 New Jersey jobs.

We all know that infrastructure matters. We saw the high cost of failure in Minneapolis and New Orleans. These investments not only create jobs today -- they will provide returns for all New Jerseyans tomorrow.

Just talk to the students I visited at the Oliver Street School in Newark. Their building is overcrowded and crumbling -- classes in English as a Second Language are held in the hallway -- special education classes are crammed into a windowless coat closet. Oliver Street School was built in 1869. Ulysses S. Grant was president that year.

Can we really expect our children to learn and to grow to their fullest potential when their classrooms are in a closet?

That's why I fought to authorize $3.9 billion in new school construction funds --money that can be leveraged into $5.4 billion in investments across the state.

My hat goes off to Senator Rice and Assemblyman Coutinho, who stood with me to do right by New Jersey's school children.

Through all of these initiatives, we're planting the seeds for future prosperity.

We are positioning as many people and businesses as possible to survive the national recession ... and then thrive once the inevitable recovery begins.

We've structurally reformed our oft-criticized corporate tax code ...reforms that will encourage investment, and research & development ... reforms that will allow businesses to recoup operating losses and competitively align our rates with those of surrounding states.

These actions are especially beneficial to our core biotech, pharma, high-tech and alternative-energy sectors.

We've taken steps to expedite regulatory review and offer permit relief in this time of recession.
It is through this comprehensive approach that we expect to maintain a lower unemployment rate than the rest of the nation.

Today, New Jersey's unemployment stands at 6.1% -- nationally, the rate is 7.2%. Make no mistake --as long as one New Jerseyan is unemployed, we have work to do.

While we are reducing corporate taxes, we have also expanded the Senior Freeze on property taxes to include 70,000 additional senior households.

And, we have continued to expand the Earned Income Tax Credit ... making work pay.

Let me repeat -- getting our state through this national economic crisis is my Number One, Number Two, and Number Three priority.

Current economic circumstances dictate that we take steps which in normal times I would not.

It is regrettable that over a period of at least 15 years, when the sun was shining and the economy was strong, New Jersey failed to put its financial house in order ... particularly our public pension system.

It's only because of today's financial crisis that I've recommended giving local governments the option of deferring a percentage of their employee pension payments.

To be sure, I have demonstrated a commitment to the solvency of our pension system.

Over the past three years, we've contributed more money to that system than previous administrations have in the preceding 15 years combined.

Our plan doesn't require towns to put off pension payments -- it simply gives them a tool to work through this financial emergency.

Some may not need to exercise their option. But others will have to either seek cap waivers, leading to significant property tax hikes, or impose unacceptable cuts in public safety and other vital services.

Yes, the economy and its harsh impact on our people remain our most significant challenges.
That said, we have not turned our back on long-term strategic goals like reforming and restructuring our state finances ... improving government ethics ...enhancing public safety and education ...and protecting the state's most vulnerable citizens.

Even as we've cut the budget by $1.4 billion, we've continued to reshape and reduce the size of government.

Today, there are nearly 4,000 fewer employees on the state payroll than when I took office and 3,000 fewer at our independent authorities.

That's 7,000 people! By comparison, nearly half of our municipalities have fewer residents than our personnel reductions.

We've also scrubbed line-by-line state government for inefficiencies and implemented departmental consolidations ... We ended Christmas tree spending ... We improved the timing and transparency of the budget process ... We approved a constitutional amendment to give voters a greater voice on state borrowing ... These ideas have been on the table for nearly two decades. We made them happen.

Additionally, starting with the upcoming year's budget, I have through Executive Order required that recurring expenditures be matched with recurring revenues.

We're ending our dependency on gimmicks and one-shots. Meaningful reforms are in place. We are truly doing more with less.

This past year, we also made progress on ethics reform, although not enough to my liking.

As you know, I've taken steps through executive orders to close loopholes in the state pay-to-play ban ... including by extending that ban to state redevelopment contracts.

We created the office of Comptroller to audit the use of public money.

I put a former prosecutor, Matt Boxer, to work systematically searching for breakdowns in financial controls and government efficiencies.

Now I am asking you, the Legislature, to end pay-to-play, wheeling, and no-bid contracts at all levels of government ...to lower the limit on campaign contributions to county committees... and to make the state ethics committee a public- member only body.

These initiatives come in addition to steps taken by the previous Legislature to end dual-office holding, among other measures.

I want to acknowledge the contributions of Senate President Codey who, as governor, helped enact one of the strongest state pay-to-play bans in the nation ... and the efforts of Speaker Roberts, who overhauled the Legislature's ethics commission and has been a champion of publicly-financed campaigns.

With continuing ethical and legal breakdowns by some, and with pay-to-play headlines unfolding in Alaska, Illinois, and other states, we must act to restore the public trust.

People deserve a government they can trust. People have a right to know that when a decision is made, when a contract is awarded, when a law is passed, the officials in charge had only one thing in mind: the public good.

Let's complete our agenda on ethics because it's the right thing to do. In addition to my fiscal and ethics reform agendas, no issue has been closer to my heart than education.

Our schools, from pre-K through college, rank among the very best in the nation.

This month, Education Week rated us as one of the top five systems for overall performance in the nation and number two in providing a chance for our graduates to succeed in life.

Test scores across the state reinforce their conclusion. Results count. We already lead the country in graduation rates and in access to quality pre-school.

While there are clear exceptions, New Jersey schools give most of our children an exceptional opportunity to build a bright future.

The new school funding formula for which we now are seeking court approval will only strengthen our commitment to success.

That formula recognizes that 50 percent of disadvantaged students live beyond the borders of Abbott districts.

The formula fulfills the state's obligation to provide a thorough and efficient education to all children, wherever they live.

In fact, even though we cut the overall state budget by $1.4 billion, we've held firm in increasing total spending on education by nearly $500 million.

Beyond our financial commitment, we're also working to upgrade standards, curricula, and graduation requirements in all of our schools.

We've been collaborating with Colin and Alma Powell's effort to substantially lower dropout rates. Again, obviously, results matter, but outcomes are best measured in more than just statistics.

We educate our young people one student at a time. We are joined today by one of New Jersey's bright hopes for the future.

Kamaris Loor came to New Jersey from Ecuador in 1995 and is on track to graduate this spring from Union City High School with a 4.2 grade point average -- I didn't even know you could get a 4.2 GPA.

Kamaris is a county champion in the 100 meter butterfly -- she did cancer research at the Susan Lehman Cancer Research Center -- and next year, Kamaris will attend Brown University to begin a joint undergraduate and medical degree program.

She is clearly on a track of success. But ... behind every student's success is an exceptional teacher.

Nadia Makar is the science chairperson at Kamaris' high school, where she has been a career educator for 35 years. Nadia is a prime example of the excellence you'll find among teachers in New Jersey's classrooms.

Kamaris isn't alone. In fourth, eighth, and eleventh grades -- and in both language arts and math -- test score improvements in Union City are beating the state average. I'd like to ask Kamaris and Nadia to stand and be recognized -- not only for what they've achieved, but in recognition of all the great schools across New Jersey.

Beyond pre-K through 12,I need not tell you about the excellence of our county and state colleges and public universities.

They continue to provide an affordable path for our young people from all walks of life to access the American promise.

To that end, even in difficult times like the last three years, we've expanded financial aid for New Jersey's low- and moderate-income college students.

Now ... let me turn to another focus for success.

We've taken great strides in making New Jersey a safer place to live.

In 2007, we achieved a 7% statewide reduction in violent crime and an 11% reduction in murder. In the first three quarters of 2008, we have achieved another 7% reduction in violent crime, and an additional 6% decrease in murders.

Eighteen months ago, I launched a statewide anti-crime plan in cooperation with local authorities to bring safety to our streets and neighborhoods.

We addressed the issue comprehensively through prevention, re-entry and enforcement initiatives. Gangs were stealing young lives and leaving people in fear of letting their children play on our streets.

So ... we marshaled resources across state departments and local law enforcement agencies to focus on reducing gang, gun, and drug activity.

The results are showing up on the streets of Newark, Asbury Park, Vineland, and communities throughout the state.

I want to thank Assembly Majority Leader Watson Coleman for her leadership on this issue, and Mayor Booker for his hard work and cooperation.

Just as we are addressing crime, we have been tackling highway and pedestrian safety, and we've realized exceptional results.

One of our most important safety measures is increased awareness of seatbelt use. As you can imagine, I have a personal stake in this issue.

I'm blessed to be here today, and if one more person decides to buckle up because of my poor example, then something good will have come from my mistake.

Through enforcement and education -- particularly for teenage drivers -- and with previously higher gas prices ... highway deaths dropped by 127 lives year over year -- that's a drop of nearly 18%. Highway deaths are down to a level not seen in the past 25 years.

Fewer drunk drivers on our roads, stricter licensing requirements on young drivers, and enforcement of seat belt laws have resulted in fewer accidents and fatalities. Safer roads and better drivers should result in lower auto insurance rates and overall economic costs.

On another public safety front, the protection of our most vulnerable children remains one of our highest moral responsibilities.

Over the past three years, our newly created Department of Children and Families took a sometimes broken, understaffed, and flawed system and made it a ray of hope for at-risk kids.

The department found permanent homes for 4,200 children, drastically reducing the backlog and caseloads. And the department recruited over 5,200 new foster and adoptive families -- a net gain of more than 1,800 safe, stable, and loving homes for foster children.

We rebuilt a broken system and are on track to becoming one of the very best. These efforts are driven by dedicated public employees -- people like James Williams.

As a senior case worker at the Division of Youth and Family Services, James stands up every day for New Jersey's most vulnerable children.

So on behalf of all his colleagues, I'd like to invite James to stand up and accept the thanks of a grateful state for moving us from a position of weakness to a position of success in protecting our children.

These highlighted achievements and work in no way describe the entirety of our agenda and activities.

Keep in mind:
* We enacted a family leave insurance program -- the second in the nation.
* We strengthened our worker's compensation system.
* We continued reform of our public pension system.
* We appointed record numbers of women and minorities to the bench.
* We created the office of supplier diversity.
* We built and dedicated a long-overdue World War II memorial.
* We reformed the Charity Care funding formula to better protect health care for our most vulnerable, especially in our urban areas.
* We created an inter-agency Council on the Prevention of Homelessness.
* We finalized the Highlands Master Plan.
* We built and participated in a regional auction system for carbon credits.
* And ... we have delivered a nationally recognized Energy Master Plan as well as a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan.

No one has been more instrumental in shepherding environmental initiatives than my former DEP commissioner, Lisa Jackson.

I had hoped to introduce Lisa today, but tomorrow, I'm proud to say she is appearing before the United States Senate for her confirmation hearing as EPA Administrator.

As you know, Lisa is the only state commissioner to be nominated by President-elect Obama for his Cabinet -- and I know you'll join me in wishing her great success.

Now, as we look toward fiscal year 2010, it's probable that the national recession will continue to take a toll on our revenues, and in March, I will undoubtedly propose additional, painful cuts.

Even with these harsh realities, we must continue to do everything we can to limit the impact of budget cuts on the state's most vulnerable citizens, our children's education, and public safety.

Some of our work outside of the budget will be complex and controversial.

A case in point -- today, I am sending formal instruction to the Local Finance Board to firmly enforce the 4% tax levy cap. Last year, we saw 80% of reporting municipalities come in over the cap. In fact, 30% came in with increases of 10% or more.

We need to reverse that trend, and that's why it's important that we enact the pension deferral bill to give towns the tools they need.

I will also ask Commissioner Doria to request, for both the Legislature and myself, concrete recommendations on cost saving from shared services and consolidations to be submitted from the Consolidation Commission by March 31st.

I will also direct the COAH board to allow for maximum flexibility and ample time for collaborative review of all the 240-plus affordable housing plans submitted by the 80% of the required municipalities who did the right thing and filed plans by December 31st.

Finally, recognizing the economic realities and pressures of the current economic environment, I am calling today for a one-year moratorium on the 2.5% developer's COAH fee while additionally exempting projects that were in the pipeline before the fee was instituted.

I look forward to working with Speaker Roberts, and Senators Codey and Lesniak, who all support this initiative.

A second area of vital importance and concern is open space preservation, which has always been one of New Jersey's priorities ... and which should be addressed before June 30th.

It is my preferred approach that we put in place a long-term funding solution.

That said ... we need, at a minimum, an interim bonding question for November's ballot to extend the financing the voters approved in 2007.

Between the budget, ethics, and job creation for the economy, I will need bipartisan cooperation to address the people's agenda.

My door is always open to anyone who is seriously interested in putting good ideas ... intellectually honest ideas ... on the table.

One good idea I like ... is the posting of our state expenditures on the Internet as suggested by a number of Republican legislators.

I think this is a credible way to increase accountability and transparency in our budget process, and so I have directed the Comptroller to review how to undertake this initiative.

In closing, three years ago, I came to Trenton to make our state a better place for all our people...to move an agenda on fiscal responsibility ... on ethics ... on early childhood education ... on the environment... and on health care.

We've made important strides ...There surely is more work to do ... and I'm committed to finishing the job. We don't choose the circumstances in which we govern.

Let me repeat ...my first priority -- my second priority --and my third priority -- is to get our state through these challenging economic times.

Our job is to help our citizens cope with this crisis, and lay a foundation for a strong recovery.

Great crises, through necessity, make us think clearly and practically about the most important responsibilities of government.

Necessity forces us to choose our most important objectives. Necessity focuses us on our most vital legacies. In 2008, my second and third grandchildren were born.

When I look at those two boys -- and when I think of the young men they'll one day become -- when I think about the world we're creating for all of our children and grandchildren -- I'm certain that the work we're doing is important.

We must strive for universal pre-school, so that all of our children have a chance to succeed in a competitive world.

We must do our part to fight climate change by investing in energy conservation, alternative power, and mass transit ...We must flat-out build the new mass transit tunnel between New Jersey and New York -- doubling the number of passenger trains that cross the Hudson each day.

We must work with county executives, freeholders, mayors, and school boards to make New Jersey more affordable by holding the line on local property taxes.

In the coming year, we must build on our commitment to healthy children and healthy parents ...I entered public life because I believe that government matters, that government can play a constructive role in people's lives. I'm sure you feel the same.

Almost 35 years ago, I chose to live in New Jersey because of its great strengths.

I raised my children here, and through good times and bad, I have always been able to count on my community to stand together.

Today ... we must stand together. In ordinary times, ours is a tough job ... but these are no ordinary times.

Given the magnitude of the national economic crisis, the challenges we face are unprecedented and daunting.

I've never run from a challenge, and I'm not running from this one.

Everywhere I go, people ask me two questions: How long will this recession last? Have we seen the worst of it?

I wish the answers were easy. They're not.

The national recession undoubtedly will intensify in the next few months and will likely last beyond 2009. New Jersey is faring better than other states by most standards.

But when one worker loses his job -- when one family loses its home -- when one child goes without health care -- our work is incomplete.

Hubert Humphrey once offered that society's character is measured by how it treats those in the dawn of life --its children ... how it treats those in the twilight of life -- its seniors ... and how it treats those in the shadows of life --those with special needs, the sick, and the forgotten.

New Jerseyans have a strong character, because New Jerseyans believe in our common good.

That's why I have confidence that if we pursue the common good -- together -- we will get through these difficult times and emerge even stronger.

Let me say this to the people of New Jersey: I may not always say what's popular, but you can be sure that what I say comes from the heart.

I know that government can be a force for good in people's lives.

Members of the Legislature, we may not always agree ... but we must, always ... share ... a common commitment to making the world a better place for this generation, and the beyond.

It's fitting that on this 200th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln's birth, we conclude with his hope:

"With firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right ... let us strive on to finish the work we are in."

Thank you and may God bless New Jersey and America!